Another Failed Test

After almost a month in office, President Trump was given and failed his first round of tests from President Putin.  It should come as no surprise that a newly elected President will come under immediate pressure from adversaries abroad to test their resolve and commitment to various issues.  For example, Kim Jong-Un wasted no time before testing the Pukguksong-2, a medium-range ballistic missile that flew nearly 310 miles into the Sea of Japan.

And now, the Kremlin has begun to probe and test Western Europe and the United States in an attempt to better understand President Trump’s policy positions.  President Putin wants to know where the push back will be, where can he get away with his increasingly provocative and aggressive foreign policy and where are the no-go areas.  Over the past week Russia has done the following:

Russia’s actions in the past week are as much a test as they are a tactic.   The Kremlin has repeatedly utilized a strategy best coined as ‘fail fast and fail cheap.’  But instead of failing fast and  failing cheap, Russia is succeeding fast and succeeding cheap.

President Putin’s success is due in part because of the relative indifference expressed by the West’s lack of response to any of these probes by Russia.  In fact, the only response by the United States has been the deployment of an additional several thousand American troops to the Baltic States, which was initiated under the Obama administration’s watch.

Time and time again Russia has made these low cost bets in an attempt to probe and understand the reactions and behaviors of their targets.  When dealing with an ever increasingly dangerous autocratic leader like Putin, any indifference shown by the prevailing powers only serves to bolster Russian foreign policy in the future.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Another Failed Test

  1. Nice, I was missing my Resurgent Russia fix.

    Like

  2. e5w says:

    Naturally these types of provocations require a unique response based on the perpetrating state. I wonder how the new administration could have more effectively responded, showing strength in a meaningful way without escalating the situation.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s